In our experience the substantive legal position on a transfer or a restructure is rarely the
hard part. What causes problems is timetable compression: a decision is taken, a go-live date is
announced publicly, and only then does anyone map backwards from that date through the
consultation obligations. By the time HR is involved, the honest advice is that the announced date
is not achievable without cutting a corner.
The most valuable thing we do on these programmes is get involved early enough to build the
timetable forwards from the obligations rather than backwards from a press release. That is
usually a matter of weeks of foresight and it saves months of remediation.
What we deliver
A programme plan with the consultation obligations mapped to dates. Employee liability
information and due diligence support on both sides of a transfer. Measures identification and
consultation with recognised unions or elected representatives. Selection pools and criteria that
will withstand challenge. Consultation meeting scripts, letters and records. Individual
consultation management. Appeals. And the complete documented bundle at the end, because the
question “can you show us the consultation records” arrives eighteen months later,
long after everyone involved has moved on.